How would you approach conducting literature reviews to support development strategies and decisions?

When conducting literature reviews to support development strategies and decisions, I would start by clearly defining the objectives and scope of the review. I would then identify relevant databases and sources to search for literature, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and veterinary journals. Once I have gathered the necessary literature, I would thoroughly read and evaluate each source to determine its relevance and quality. I would extract key findings and information from the literature and organize them in a systematic manner. Finally, I would synthesize the findings and present them in a concise and meaningful way to support development strategies and decisions.

In conducting literature reviews, I would begin by thoroughly understanding the development strategies and decisions that need support. This would help me define the research objectives and the specific criteria for selecting relevant literature. I would extensively search scientific databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD)'s database to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant literature. To evaluate the quality and relevance of the literature, I would apply critical thinking skills to assess the study design, sample size, statistical methods, and any conflicts of interest. To ensure adherence to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards, I would document the search strategy, selection criteria, and key findings in a systematic and transparent manner. Time management is crucial in literature reviews, so I would set clear deadlines for each stage of the process, allocate sufficient time for reading and analysis, and prioritize the most relevant studies for presentation and decision-making.

When conducting literature reviews to support development strategies and decisions, I follow a structured approach that begins with a thorough understanding of the research objectives, stakeholders' needs, and pertinent regulations. I collaborate with subject matter experts and key stakeholders to define the research question and establish criteria for literature selection. To ensure a comprehensive search, I employ a combination of keyword searches and hand-searching relevant journals, conference proceedings, and regulatory agency databases. I use software such as EndNote to manage references and remove duplicates. As I read each study, I critically evaluate the study design, sample size, statistical methods, and potential bias and conflicts of interest. I also assess the strength of evidence and relevance to the specific development strategies and decisions. To synthesize the findings, I employ thematic analysis and use visualization tools like mind maps or visual abstracts. Finally, I provide a clear and concise summary that highlights key findings, knowledge gaps, and implications for decision-making.