Can you describe your process for evaluating manuscript submissions?

Sample answer to the question

When evaluating manuscript submissions, I first start by thoroughly reading the submissions to get a sense of the writing style, plot, and characters. I take notes as I read to help me remember my impressions. After reading the manuscript, I analyze its strengths and weaknesses, looking for compelling storytelling, unique voice, well-developed characters, and engaging plot. I also consider whether the manuscript aligns with current market trends and the target audience. I provide detailed feedback and recommendations to senior agents and authors, highlighting what worked well and areas for improvement. Additionally, I maintain records of all submissions, correspondence, and contracts in an organized manner.

A more solid answer

When evaluating manuscript submissions, I have a systematic process that allows me to thoroughly assess each submission. First, I read the submission from start to finish, taking notes on various aspects such as writing style, character development, plot structure, and pacing. I pay close attention to the manuscript's strengths, looking for compelling storytelling, unique voice, and well-rounded characters. I also consider whether the manuscript aligns with current market trends and the target audience. After reading, I compile my notes and provide detailed feedback and recommendations to senior agents and authors. I highlight what worked well, areas that may need improvement, and how the manuscript can be positioned in the market. Additionally, I ensure that all records of submissions, correspondence, and contracts are meticulously organized for easy reference.

Why this is a more solid answer:

The solid answer provides a more detailed and comprehensive description of the candidate's evaluation process. It includes specific details about the aspects the candidate assesses in the submissions and how they provide feedback and recommendations. However, it could still benefit from providing more examples or anecdotes.

An exceptional answer

When evaluating manuscript submissions, I immerse myself in the world created by the author. I start by carefully reading the submission, analyzing the writing style, characterization, plot structure, dialogue, and pacing. I go beyond evaluating the technical aspects and delve into the emotional impact of the story. I ask myself if the manuscript resonates with me on a deeper level, if it evokes strong emotions or makes me reflect on the themes presented. I also consider the manuscript's marketability and its potential to stand out in the current literary landscape. After reading, I compile a comprehensive report that includes a detailed analysis of the manuscript's strengths and weaknesses. I provide specific examples, highlighting memorable scenes, well-developed characters, and captivating storytelling. I also offer constructive feedback on areas that can be improved, such as pacing, dialogue, or plot twists. Additionally, I make recommendations on how the manuscript can be positioned in the market and which publishers or audience it would appeal to. Throughout the evaluation process, I maintain clear and organized records of submissions, correspondence, and contracts to ensure efficient management of the authors' careers.

Why this is an exceptional answer:

The exceptional answer goes above and beyond in providing a comprehensive and detailed description of the candidate's evaluation process. It showcases their passion for literature and their ability to immerse themselves in the world created by the author. The answer also includes specific examples and anecdotes that demonstrate the candidate's critical thinking abilities and attention to detail. Additionally, it highlights their understanding of marketability and positioning manuscripts in the industry.

How to prepare for this question

Familiarize yourself with current market trends in the publishing industry, including popular genres, themes, and styles.
Practice analyzing and critiquing manuscripts to develop your evaluation skills. Consider joining a writing critique group or taking writing courses.
Read extensively across various genres to broaden your understanding of storytelling techniques and to expose yourself to diverse writing styles.
Stay organized by developing a system for managing submissions, correspondence, and contracts. Consider using literary submission management software to streamline the process.
Prepare to provide constructive feedback by honing your communication skills. Practice delivering feedback in a diplomatic and helpful manner.
Network and attend literary events to build relationships with authors, publishers, and industry professionals. This can provide insights into market trends and potential opportunities.

What interviewers are evaluating

Written Communication
Analytical Thinking
Attention to Detail
Organizational Skills